Anti-Semitism ] [ Family ] Israel ] Kashrut ] Home ] Social, Scientific and Legal Issues ] General Torah Issues ] videos ]

Family Issues     

חכמת נשים בנתה ביתה

CONTENTS

YUCHSIN and GITTIN: Will Gender War Divide Us Into Two Communities ?

Female Infidelity and the Orthodox

 

Will there be a Military Draft for Women in US?

No Fun Without Family

Gay Rights Bills and Religion - Threat to Religions and Family People

Ten Years after the GET Bill - Insights into the Laws of Gittin

 

 

 


Newsweek Reveals Female Infidelity: What about Orthodox Women?

 

Newsweek's July 1 issue tells about exploding female infidelity in American marriages. Exact statistics are not available, but therapists who specialize in these issues suggest that half of American men cheat on their wives, and about a third of American women cheat on their husband. The news is not only that women cheat, but also that the female infidelity is rapidly approaching that of men.

 

One therapist suggests that female infidelity has gone from ten percent to fifty percent in just twenty years! The article notes that as infidelity increases, and more people suffer from it, attitudes harden against it. Statistics show that eighty percent of people oppose infidelity in marriage today, a ten percent increase over 30 some years.

 

The huge numbers of broken families and broken children, not to mention the broken spouse, cry out a warning that infidelity is deadly!

 

Women find their affairs at work. The new ethic of men and women working together is destroying family. Men and women cannot sit together all day long, dressed for the best, smiling and complimenting, without trouble. Family is where the mask is off. Family is where anger and nervousness are manifested. Thus, people enjoy work and suffer at home. Ultimately, the family cannot compete with work.

 

What about the Orthodox woman? She, too, is increasingly working outside of the house. Even if she does not, her husband works in an office where women look great and smile all day long. How is marriage to survive?

 

When Ed Koch forced the police in New York City to allow women police to patrol with men, in each case, there was a divorce. Not every married woman can compete with the young lovelies in the office. Not every man can refuse the pull that destroyed so many even pious people. Piety has nothing to do with it. The Talmud warns us that the most righteous person can collapse from sexual desire. It is often the most religious person who doesn't see which way the wind is blowing until it is too late.

 

The future is not going to be easier than the present. And the present is awful. At least, let us realize how bad it is.

 

Let us make every effort to establish a private business, so we don't have to live on the edge, and our children have true hope.

 

See also our www.kedusho.com site for an additional article on this topic.

 

Will there be a Draft for Women?

 

    There is now a serious possibility that Orthodox Jewish women may be drafted into the American army.

 

A study made by the 1992 Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Military found that most Americans, by a large margin, want women drafted.  It is assumed that the margin then, 52-39 in favor, would be even larger today, and much larger in a few years.

    The Selection Service System explains that Congress has the ultimate power to determine who is drafted. However, Congress usually follows public opinion, which is probably going to become even more in favor of women in the draft as time goes on.

    In 1980 a U.S. District Court ruled that women must be drafted. The Supreme Court overruled this in Rostker v Goldberg, because women do not serve in combat.

    However, in 1994 the Department of Defense noted that 16 percent of recruits are women, and they are playing increasingly larger roles in the military. They therefore suggested that the decision to draft women must be regularly updated, and presumably changed when women assume combat roles.

    Women now play direct combat roles in the Air Force as pilots, and in the Navy aboard ships. In the army they are trained in the use of weapons, and as in Iraq, are shipped to combat areas. In the invasion of Panama in the time of President Reagan, a woman using a machine gun on a jeep captured a position in direct combat.

    The problem of an Orthodox woman in the draft is a cardinal religious problem.

 

 

 


 

No Fun Without Family

 

By Rabbi David Eidensohn

 

 

America is a culture of fun. Fun is a huge industry. Movie stars, sports figures, and entertainers make fortunes. Shaq O’Neil makes $200,000 a game, or $6,000 a minute of playing time.

 

The successful doctor up the block from me just took a second mortgage on his house. Without it, he can’t keep up with the HMOs, pay his insurance, and feed his family.

 

Kobe Bryant declined to plead in a rape case. Michael Jackson, who entertains our children, was arrested for child molestation. A sports columnist wrote recently how atypical a week it was because nobody in professional basketball got arrested.

 

A friend of mine worked thirty years for IBM. When he neared retirement age, IBM fired him. He now lives on a tiny pension, and is not getting any younger. Another friend told me a year before he was fired, “The computer industry drains you until you reach fifty, and then they let you go. They don’t want to support you in your old age.”

 

 What he predicted came true. Everybody knows it is true. The Global companies and billionaires get rich while most people struggle. Today, a family cannot survive unless the wife leaves her children and works. This is because the pursuit of fun has doubled consumption since the fifties. Double consumption means double people working.

 

If we could devote the time we spend on “fun” to developing financial stability and security, we would have much more real fun.

 

Instead, we are becoming a society of very rich global business people and fun stars, and an increasingly oppressed everyone else.

 

Pulitzer Prize winning columnist David Broder of the Washington Post recently studied the finances of all of the states in the country. They are all going on the dole. One state built a new prison but has no money to hire guards. A county just sold the farm of an 89-year-old woman because she didn’t pay a few hundred dollars in taxes.

 

Does this sound important? If so, why do people sit for a few hours every night watching television or videos? Why are they not worried about an impending financial collapse of state government

 

You may think that the states will turn to the Federal government. However, the Federal annual income is about a trillion or two dollars. The Federal deficit is about 6 or 7 trillion. In a few years, that will rise to 25 trillion dollars. How can a country, spending printed paper with nothing to back it, survive? This is how they do it in the banana republics. But, as Paul Krugman of the New York Times observed, the financial debacle facing the Federal government is far worse than faced by any banana republic. (On our website gendercentral.com are various articles about the financial situation of the country.)

 

Does anyone care? No. They are too busy watching Michael Jackson and anyone else that provides “fun.”

 

You may think that I am saying that entertainers should get less money. This is not my message. I am not in favor of lessening anyone’s earnings. I want to do away with the “fanaticism of fun.” Fun as we have it in America is a consuming and deleterious thing. When we teach children to worship anyone who has certain physical characteristics and to deride others who are less blessed, we destroy our children.

 

My children, and nearly all of my neighbors, never heard of Shaq or Kobe , and certainly not Michael Jackson. We have no televisions. We never go to movies. We spend our money on our grandchildren, not sports.

 

A Presidential Commission on Fatherhood, during the Clinton administration, found that fewer Americans want marriage. People are now having babies without marriage, because marriage doesn’t work or is too demanding for “fun” people. The study found that American men consider children an expense that interferes with their fun. In my Orthodox Jewish community, we have no “professional fun.” That is why we have flourishing families, may they increase. Ultimately, family is the finest fun, the real thing.

 

My energy goes for my children and grandchildren. My walls are lined with pictures, not of movie stars, not of sports stars, but of grandchildren. Somebody said to me, “David, you are a billionaire.” What billionaire has what I have? You can’t buy a happy grandchild.

 

I have fun. I get down on the rug and bark like a dog. My little grandchildren go wild. Meanwhile, secular sir is out there drinking. What fun. Or he has other fun. “Fun” ultimately leads to searching for what is not available. Searching for fun leads to addictive and compulsory behavior, even perversion. When you live for fun, you never find it. Elvis Presley killed himself seeking a bigger dose of drugs. He no longer had “fun” from the old dose.

 

When you live for family, every day is heaven, even when a grandchild finds out where you keep your financial records and throws them all over the floor.

 

A child senses if a parent is dedicated. When a child realizes that parents live only for them, the child responds and makes the parent happier than any fun. When a child realizes that parents would rather be at the movies than listening to his prattle, the child can make the parents so miserable that there are no words for it.

 

Thus, “fun” and family are mutually exclusive. Throughout the Western world, people are into fun. They are not having children. Then they wonder why their world is disappearing.

 

In Europe they just raised the retirement age. There are not enough young people to put earnings into pension funds. People who are ready to retire have to get back to work. The future is bleak. People live longer, and retirement ages will be longer and longer. When will it end? There is no world without children.

 

France just had a heat wave that killed thousands of people. Who were they? They were old people who sat and suffocated because no children were there to help them. The government can’t do it. When my wife and I are 120 years old, our children will fight for the right to have us as guests.

 

Europeans have no young workers from their basic population. They have to import young people from around the world. This leads to racial and religious problems, even hate. It all begins from running after fun. Where it ends, nobody knows. The power is from babies. Nothing else matters. Fun means no demographic power. Family means demographic and ultimately political power.

 

As Western whites realize they can’t have fun and children, they go without children. They then import others or allow immigration from areas that are totally different or even opposing to what they want for their country. Seeing their world disappearing, many of them become Nazis.

 I once met a financially successful woman in her forties who never married. She told me how much fun she has in her life. She just went to Hawaii . She swam, heard a good band, sampled the food, and probably met a man. Hopefully, she practiced safe sex. I felt so bad for her. I thought of what my daughters were doing. I raised them differently.

 

Once my daughters sat in front of the house and played with a little nephew. A woman walked by and asked them what they were doing. They replied, “We are babysitting our nephew.” The woman huffed and said, “My children don’t baby sit. They are not slaves!” My daughters had the proper upbringing, so they held in their feelings until they got into the house. Then we all had a good laugh.

 

In those days, there was very little money in the house. However, that Passover I bought little silver cups for my daughters. I said, “These cups are only for slaves.” Every year at the Passover meal, those cups adorned the table, and all of us thanked G-d that we were “slaves.”

 

I am a slave to my children. My children are slaves to the family. Slaves? By our standards, this is living, not slaving. But to the “fun” person, doing anything for anyone but yourself is “slavery.” When “fun” man meets “fun” woman, the first thing they do is have a fight over who is the “slave.” Half of marriages end in divorce, and many people just give up on marriage. They then have babies without marriage, which damages the child. The main thing is to have fun. Fun? Let me assure you. A broken child is no fun. A happy child is fun. And to have a happy child, you have to be a “slave.”

 

Professional “fun” is perverse. Family fun is real. Pleasure begins and ends with complete dedication to family.

 

In the sixties, rebellious college students took drugs and did sex. Some of them got sick of it and became religious. One such man came to a Yeshiva and said, “I was in San Francisco with a beautiful naked girl doing drugs. I thought this was pleasure. Believe me, it is a lot better now.”

 

Once, in a Rabbinical Court , we noticed a strangely clad woman coming to us. I couldn’t believe that in this day and age a woman could dress the way she was dressed. She looked like a poor imitation of a Medieval Nun. She had so much “fun” in her life, that now she wanted to find something else.

 

I once wrote a column that said, “Put your TV in the trash, or your child in the trash.” One of them has to go.

 

If you didn’t listen then, I tell you now, “Take your child out of the trash, and stay out of it yourself.”

 

The clock is ticking. I don’t mean the clock that ends the half in basketball. I mean the clock that ticks the seconds until our world disappears in fun.

 


Gay Rights Bills and Religion

(The following is a press-release from The National Non-Sectarian Council of Family Activists, the Gender Central Website at http://www.gendercentral.com)

            Rabbi David Eidensohn, director of the National Non-Sectarian Council of Pro-Family Activists, attacked the New York State Assembly for its Bill A1118, “Dignity for All Students Act,” because it would demonize biblical people and teach hate of the bible. It would also force all religious schools to teach that homosexuality and cross-dressing, proscribed by the bible, is acceptable. The state would issue teaching materials, textbooks and other material about atypical sexual behavior and gender identification and force every child in New York State to study them and be influenced by gay values.

            “The Bill is called ‘Dignity for All Students’ but does not teach dignity for religious students,” said Rabbi Eidensohn. “By teaching that anyone who proscribes cross-dressing and homosexuality is a hater, inciter and bigot, we replace discrimination against gays with discrimination against biblical and traditional family people. Why can we not have dignity for all people, even religious ones?” asked Rabbi Eidensohn.

            Rabbi Eidensohn slammed the New York State legislature for presenting Gay Rights bills as exempting religious people and schools when in fact they are not exempted. New York State recently passed the SONDA bill, a Gay Rights bill presented as offering exemptions to religious organizations. And yet, many counsels for Senators and Assemblymen readily admitted that a gay could sue a religious organization and the exemption would not prevail in court. Furthermore, Rabbi Eidensohn charged, one who reads the bill carefully sees that although in the description of the bill much ado is made about exemptions for religious institutions, the bill itself states any exemption in a very ambiguous way, if at all. Furthermore, one who wades through the bill and the laws it supplants realizes that there is almost no exemption at all for religious organizations regarding discriminating against gays. This means the state lied to people when it told them that the SONDA bill exempted religious organizations.

            Rabbi Eidensohn noted a similar trick was done with the Dignity for All Students Act, 1118, although in a less blatant manner. In Bill 1118, the Dignity Law, there are five sections. The main sections are two and three. Two contains a lengthy text to be added to the present law and ends with an exemption for religious schools. This exemption applies only to section two. Section three, however, does not exempt religious schools. One who is not an expert on reading bills, and most people are not, would see the exemption at the end of section two, and assume that the entire law contains an exemption for religious schools, which is not true. Section three, including the requirement for all schools in New York State to teach civility in terms of gay rights and respecting cross dressers, does not exempt religious schools. Indeed, one who does not teach the courses on civility, in section 801 and 801-a of the Education Law, has an illegal school, and the parents who send a child to such a school can be arrested for encouraging truancy in their children.

            “We have very little time to wake up,” said Rabbi Eidensohn. “The Supreme Court in Romers, 1996, already has described opposition to homosexuality, evidently biblically oriented, as “animus.” When we will realize that Gay Rights are Religious Wrongs, and that Civil Rights Laws for Gays will doom religious institutions?”

            Every Gay Rights Bill, said Rabbi Eidensohn, provides more ammunition for legal terrorism, when the Gay Lobby, with its infinite resources in lawyers, sues small places of worship, schools and even private people for not conforming to the dictates of the Gay Lobby. “We must insist,” said Rabbi Eidensohn, “that every Gay Rights Bill contains clear and explicit exemptions for religious institutions. We must insist that Gay Rights Bills not teach hatred of biblical people. We must insist that Gay Rights Bills not teach that homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle. And after all that, we must realize that if we don’t defeat Gay Rights Bills, eventually, they will demonize and criminalize biblical and traditional family people.”

            Rabbi Eidensohn noted that the Supreme Court has ruled limits on freedom of religion, assembly and speech, in accord with “compelling interests” of government. This means that when the state construes Gay Rights as a very important issue, it may refuse to respect religious rights, the right of assembly and speech that oppose Gay Rights. Just as one may not cry “fire” in a crowded theater, and thus the “compelling interests” of the state override one’s right to free speech, so one may not burn a cross with intent to indicate hate of a protected minority. By making homosexuals and cross-dresses equal in status to blacks, women and disabled people, the state has proclaimed a “compelling interest” in the advance of homosexuals and others with atypical sexual orientations. Biblical people whose bible, speech and actions oppose homosexuality and other atypical sexual orientations and practices are thus in the position of opposing, because of religion, a “compelling interest of the state,” an untenable position. The Supreme Court in Bob Jones University v United States (May 24, 1983) ruled that a religious organization that discriminated against blacks would lose its tax exemption. Once the state proclaims homosexuals a protected minority just like blacks, will this not criminalize and demonize all biblical and traditional family people? Already in many countries a preacher who teaches the biblical proscription on homosexuality in his church can be arrested.

            “The biblical and traditional family community is hiding its head in sand,” said Rabbi Eidensohn. “Surely, people think, this can’t be for real. Nobody is going to demonize or criminalize traditional family and the bible. But this is exactly what Gay Rights Bills are doing, and nobody notices, or nobody cares.

            “The Gay Lobby thrives,” said Rabbi Eidensohn, “on the ignorance of the masses of Americans, who, like the hapless masses of Russia and Germany were too busy to confront a nasty and determined element determined to seize power and destroy its enemies. There is very little time left.”      

            Rabbi Eidensohn noted that nobody believed that gays could seize control of governmental public health and take AIDS and HIV off the list of state infectious diseases, but they did. Nobody believed that gays would seize control of the federal medical dollar to divert critical funds for research on cancer and heart disease to find a medicine for AIDS, but that is what happened. Nobody believed that gays would seize control of public schools and teach tiny tots about the glories of homosexuality, but they did. Nobody believed that gays could terrorize therapists into reversing a century of research and declare that homosexuality is not a disease, but they did. “Now the gays are confronting the churches and parents, and want to demonize and criminalize them,” said Rabbi Eidensohn. “Bill 1118 and other Gay Rights Laws strike at the very civil rights of religious people to assemble in church to worship, to speak biblical ideas against homosexuality and cross-dressing, and to thrive in America . Family cannot survive when public schools brainwash a child to consider a parent who is against homosexuality as an inciter and a bigot.”

 

Ten Years after the Get Bill - Insights into the Laws of Gittin

        Ten years ago, New York State passed what is known as the GET law. The bill allows a judge, when determining how much a husband should pay his wife for support, to consider the pain and suffering of an Orthodox woman who cannot remarry because her husband refuses to give her a GET, an Orthodox divorce. This law violates a cardinal essence of divorce laws, that a husband not be forced to divorce his wife. A woman, therefore, who tells her lawyer to threaten a husband with court, may have an invalid GET. An Orthodox woman who wants a divorce must get one from a competent Beis Din, without pressures from a secular court. Any compelling of a divorce, be it physical abuse, or excessive monetary or emotional abuse, may be grounds to invalidate a GET.

   I was privileged to hear from Reb Yosef Shalom Elyashev shlit"o, the world's leading authority, that any Rov who utilizes the GET law to force a husband to give a GET loses his authority to prepare Gittin, or Orthodox divorces. Rabbi Dovid Bleich, a major American authority, has come out very strongly against the GET law. We surely don't like AGUNOTH, but the feminist wars against men only make men angrier and in the end all women suffer from such wars. Anger does not improve things, even done in the service of saving Agunoth. Throughout America, men are refusing to marry, period, and the chill will penetrate our community, as it already has, making people who come to the Chupa prepared for the worst, and such anticipation does it terrible work.

 

 

 

TOP

 

We would like to hear from you:  Drop us an e-mail line! 

Please do Contact us


 ©copyright 2003-2005 Rabbi David Eidensohn