
חכמת נשים בנתה ביתה
|
YUCHSIN and GITTIN: Will Gender War Divide Us Into Two Communities ? Female Infidelity and the Orthodox
|
| No Fun Without Family |
|
Gay Rights Bills and Religion - Threat to Religions and Family People |
|
Ten Years after the GET Bill - Insights into the Laws of Gittin |
|
|
Newsweek Reveals Female Infidelity: What about Orthodox Women?
Newsweek's July 1 issue tells about exploding female infidelity in American marriages. Exact statistics are not available, but therapists who specialize in these issues suggest that half of American men cheat on their wives, and about a third of American women cheat on their husband. The news is not only that women cheat, but also that the female infidelity is rapidly approaching that of men.
One therapist suggests that female infidelity has gone from ten percent to fifty percent in just twenty years! The article notes that as infidelity increases, and more people suffer from it, attitudes harden against it. Statistics show that eighty percent of people oppose infidelity in marriage today, a ten percent increase over 30 some years.
The huge numbers of broken families and broken children, not to mention the broken spouse, cry out a warning that infidelity is deadly!
Women find their affairs at work. The new ethic of men and women working together is destroying family. Men and women cannot sit together all day long, dressed for the best, smiling and complimenting, without trouble. Family is where the mask is off. Family is where anger and nervousness are manifested. Thus, people enjoy work and suffer at home. Ultimately, the family cannot compete with work.
What about the Orthodox woman? She, too, is increasingly working outside of the house. Even if she does not, her husband works in an office where women look great and smile all day long. How is marriage to survive?
When Ed Koch forced the police in New York City to allow women police to patrol with men, in each case, there was a divorce. Not every married woman can compete with the young lovelies in the office. Not every man can refuse the pull that destroyed so many even pious people. Piety has nothing to do with it. The Talmud warns us that the most righteous person can collapse from sexual desire. It is often the most religious person who doesn't see which way the wind is blowing until it is too late.
The future is not going to be easier than the present. And the present is awful. At least, let us realize how bad it is.
Let us make every effort to establish a private business, so we don't have to live on the edge, and our children have true hope.
See also our www.kedusho.com site for an additional article on this topic.
Will there be a Draft for Women?
There is now a serious possibility that Orthodox Jewish women may be drafted into the American army.
A study made by the 1992 Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Military found that most Americans, by a large margin, want women drafted. It is assumed that the margin then, 52-39 in favor, would be even larger today, and much larger in a few years.
The Selection Service System explains that Congress has the ultimate power to determine who is drafted. However, Congress usually follows public opinion, which is probably going to become even more in favor of women in the draft as time goes on.
In 1980 a U.S. District Court ruled that women must be drafted. The Supreme Court overruled this in Rostker v Goldberg, because women do not serve in combat.
However, in 1994 the Department of Defense noted that 16 percent of recruits are women, and they are playing increasingly larger roles in the military. They therefore suggested that the decision to draft women must be regularly updated, and presumably changed when women assume combat roles.
Women now play direct combat roles in the Air Force as pilots, and in the Navy aboard ships. In the army they are trained in the use of weapons, and as in Iraq, are shipped to combat areas. In the invasion of Panama in the time of President Reagan, a woman using a machine gun on a jeep captured a position in direct combat.
The problem of an Orthodox woman in the draft is a cardinal religious problem.
By
Rabbi David Eidensohn
The
successful doctor up the block from me just took a second mortgage on his
house. Without it, he can’t keep up with the
HMOs, pay his insurance, and feed his family.
A
friend of mine worked thirty years for IBM. When he neared retirement age,
IBM fired him. He now lives on a tiny pension, and is not getting any
younger. Another friend told me a year before he was
fired, “The computer industry drains you until you reach fifty,
and then they let you go. They don’t want to support you in your old
age.”
What
he predicted came true. Everybody knows it is true. The Global companies
and billionaires get rich while most people struggle. Today, a family
cannot survive unless the wife leaves her children and works. This is
because the pursuit of fun has doubled consumption since the fifties.
Double consumption means double people working.
If
we could devote the time we spend on “fun” to developing financial
stability and security, we would have much more real fun.
Instead,
we are becoming a society of very rich global business people and fun
stars, and an increasingly oppressed everyone else.
Pulitzer
Prize winning columnist David Broder of the
Does
this sound important? If so, why do people sit for a few hours every night
watching television or videos? Why are they not
worried about an impending financial collapse of state government
You
may think that the states will turn to the Federal government. However,
the Federal annual income is about a trillion or two dollars. The Federal
deficit is about 6 or 7 trillion. In a few
years, that will rise to 25 trillion dollars. How can a country, spending printed
paper with nothing to back it, survive? This is how they do it in
the banana republics. But, as Paul Krugman of
the New York Times observed, the financial debacle facing the Federal
government is far worse than faced by any banana republic. (On our website
gendercentral.com are various articles about the financial situation of
the country.)
Does
anyone care? No. They are too busy watching Michael Jackson and anyone
else that provides “fun.”
You
may think that I am saying that entertainers should get less money. This
is not my message. I am not in favor of lessening anyone’s earnings. I
want to do away with the “fanaticism of fun.” Fun as we have it in
My
children, and nearly all of my neighbors, never heard of Shaq or
A
Presidential Commission on Fatherhood, during the
My
energy goes for my children and grandchildren. My walls are
lined with pictures, not of movie stars, not of sports stars, but
of grandchildren. Somebody said to me, “David, you are a billionaire.”
What billionaire has what I have? You can’t
buy a happy grandchild.
I
have fun. I get down on the rug and bark like a dog. My little
grandchildren go wild. Meanwhile, secular sir is out there drinking. What
fun. Or he has other fun. “Fun” ultimately
leads to searching for what is not available. Searching
for fun leads to addictive and compulsory behavior, even perversion.
When you live for fun, you never find it. Elvis Presley killed himself
seeking a bigger dose of drugs. He no longer had “fun” from the old
dose.
When
you live for family, every day is heaven, even when a grandchild finds out
where you keep your financial records and throws them all over the floor.
A
child senses if a parent is dedicated. When a child realizes that parents
live only for them, the child responds and makes the parent happier than
any fun. When a child realizes that parents would rather be at the movies
than listening to his prattle, the child can make the parents so miserable
that there are no words for it.
Thus,
“fun” and family are mutually exclusive. Throughout the Western world,
people are into fun. They are not having children. Then they wonder why
their world is disappearing.
In
Europeans
have no young workers from their basic population. They have to import
young people from around the world. This leads to racial and religious
problems, even hate. It all begins from running after fun. Where it ends,
nobody knows. The power is from babies. Nothing else matters. Fun means no
demographic power. Family means demographic and ultimately political
power.
As
Western whites realize they can’t have fun
and children, they go without children. They then import others or allow
immigration from areas that are totally
different or even opposing to what they want for their country. Seeing
their world disappearing, many of them become Nazis.
I
once met a financially successful woman in her forties who never married.
She told me how much fun she has in her life. She just went to
Once
my daughters sat in front of the house and played with a little nephew. A
woman walked by and asked them what they were doing. They replied, “We
are babysitting our nephew.” The woman huffed and said, “My children
don’t baby sit. They are not slaves!” My daughters had the proper
upbringing, so they held in their feelings until they got into the house.
Then we all had a good laugh.
In
those days, there was very little money in the house. However, that
Passover I bought little silver cups for my daughters. I said, “These
cups are only for slaves.” Every year at the Passover meal, those cups
adorned the table, and all of us thanked G-d that we were “slaves.”
I
am a slave to my children. My children are slaves to the family. Slaves?
By our standards, this is living, not slaving. But
to the “fun” person, doing anything for anyone but yourself is “slavery.”
When “fun” man meets “fun” woman, the first thing they do is have
a fight over who is the “slave.” Half of marriages end in divorce, and
many people just give up on marriage. They then have babies without
marriage, which damages the child. The main thing is to have fun. Fun?
Let me assure you. A broken child is no fun. A happy child is fun. And
to have a happy child, you have to be a “slave.”
Professional
“fun” is perverse. Family fun is real. Pleasure begins and ends with
complete dedication to family.
In
the sixties, rebellious college students took drugs and did sex. Some of
them got sick of it and became religious. One such man came to a Yeshiva
and said, “I was in
Once,
in a
I
once wrote a column that said, “Put your TV in the trash, or your child
in the trash.” One of them has to go.
If
you didn’t listen then, I tell you now, “Take
your child out of the trash, and stay out of it yourself.”
The
clock is ticking. I don’t mean the clock that
ends the half in basketball. I mean the clock that ticks the seconds until
our world disappears in fun.
(The following is a press-release from The National Non-Sectarian Council of Family Activists, the Gender Central Website at http://www.gendercentral.com)
Rabbi David Eidensohn, director of the National Non-Sectarian
Council of Pro-Family Activists, attacked the New York State Assembly for its
Bill A1118, “Dignity for All Students Act,” because it would demonize
biblical people and teach hate of the bible. It would also force all religious
schools to teach that homosexuality and cross-dressing, proscribed by the
bible, is acceptable. The state would issue teaching materials, textbooks and
other material about atypical sexual behavior and gender identification and
force every child in
“The Bill is called ‘Dignity for All Students’ but does not teach dignity for religious students,” said Rabbi Eidensohn. “By teaching that anyone who proscribes cross-dressing and homosexuality is a hater, inciter and bigot, we replace discrimination against gays with discrimination against biblical and traditional family people. Why can we not have dignity for all people, even religious ones?” asked Rabbi Eidensohn.
Rabbi Eidensohn slammed the
Rabbi Eidensohn noted a similar trick was done with the Dignity for All
Students Act, 1118, although in a less blatant manner. In Bill 1118, the
Dignity Law, there are five sections. The main sections are two and three. Two
contains a lengthy text to be added to the present law and ends with an
exemption for religious schools. This exemption applies only to section two.
Section three, however, does not exempt religious schools. One who is not an
expert on reading bills, and most people are not, would see the exemption at
the end of section two, and assume that the entire law contains an exemption
for religious schools, which is not true. Section three, including the
requirement for all schools in
“We have very little time to wake up,” said Rabbi Eidensohn. “The Supreme Court in Romers, 1996, already has described opposition to homosexuality, evidently biblically oriented, as “animus.” When we will realize that Gay Rights are Religious Wrongs, and that Civil Rights Laws for Gays will doom religious institutions?”
Every Gay Rights Bill, said Rabbi Eidensohn, provides more ammunition for legal terrorism, when the Gay Lobby, with its infinite resources in lawyers, sues small places of worship, schools and even private people for not conforming to the dictates of the Gay Lobby. “We must insist,” said Rabbi Eidensohn, “that every Gay Rights Bill contains clear and explicit exemptions for religious institutions. We must insist that Gay Rights Bills not teach hatred of biblical people. We must insist that Gay Rights Bills not teach that homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle. And after all that, we must realize that if we don’t defeat Gay Rights Bills, eventually, they will demonize and criminalize biblical and traditional family people.”
Rabbi Eidensohn noted that the Supreme Court has ruled limits on
freedom of religion, assembly and speech, in accord with “compelling
interests” of government. This means that when the state construes Gay
Rights as a very important issue, it may refuse to respect religious rights,
the right of assembly and speech that oppose Gay Rights. Just as one may not
cry “fire” in a crowded theater, and thus the “compelling interests”
of the state override one’s right to free speech, so one may not burn a
cross with intent to indicate hate of a protected minority. By making
homosexuals and cross-dresses equal in status to blacks, women and disabled
people, the state has proclaimed a “compelling interest” in the advance of
homosexuals and others with atypical sexual orientations. Biblical people
whose bible, speech and actions oppose homosexuality and other atypical sexual
orientations and practices are thus in the position of opposing, because of
religion, a “compelling interest of the state,” an untenable position. The
Supreme Court in
“The biblical and traditional family community is hiding its head in sand,” said Rabbi Eidensohn. “Surely, people think, this can’t be for real. Nobody is going to demonize or criminalize traditional family and the bible. But this is exactly what Gay Rights Bills are doing, and nobody notices, or nobody cares.
“The Gay Lobby thrives,” said Rabbi Eidensohn, “on the ignorance
of the masses of Americans, who, like the hapless masses of
Rabbi Eidensohn noted that nobody believed that gays could seize
control of governmental public health and take AIDS and HIV off the list of
state infectious diseases, but they did. Nobody believed that gays would seize
control of the federal medical dollar to divert critical funds for research on
cancer and heart disease to find a medicine for AIDS, but that is what
happened. Nobody believed that gays would seize control of public schools and
teach tiny tots about the glories of homosexuality, but they did. Nobody
believed that gays could terrorize therapists into reversing a century of
research and declare that homosexuality is not a disease, but they did. “Now
the gays are confronting the churches and parents, and want to demonize and
criminalize them,” said Rabbi Eidensohn. “Bill 1118 and other Gay Rights
Laws strike at the very civil rights of religious people to assemble in church
to worship, to speak biblical ideas against homosexuality and cross-dressing,
and to thrive in
Ten Years after the Get Bill - Insights into the Laws of Gittin
Ten years ago, New York State passed what is known as the GET law. The bill allows a judge, when determining how much a husband should pay his wife for support, to consider the pain and suffering of an Orthodox woman who cannot remarry because her husband refuses to give her a GET, an Orthodox divorce. This law violates a cardinal essence of divorce laws, that a husband not be forced to divorce his wife. A woman, therefore, who tells her lawyer to threaten a husband with court, may have an invalid GET. An Orthodox woman who wants a divorce must get one from a competent Beis Din, without pressures from a secular court. Any compelling of a divorce, be it physical abuse, or excessive monetary or emotional abuse, may be grounds to invalidate a GET.
I was privileged to hear from Reb Yosef Shalom Elyashev shlit"o, the world's leading authority, that any Rov who utilizes the GET law to force a husband to give a GET loses his authority to prepare Gittin, or Orthodox divorces. Rabbi Dovid Bleich, a major American authority, has come out very strongly against the GET law. We surely don't like AGUNOTH, but the feminist wars against men only make men angrier and in the end all women suffer from such wars. Anger does not improve things, even done in the service of saving Agunoth. Throughout America, men are refusing to marry, period, and the chill will penetrate our community, as it already has, making people who come to the Chupa prepared for the worst, and such anticipation does it terrible work.
|

We would like to hear from you: Drop us an e-mail line!
Please
do Contact
us
©copyright 2003-2005 Rabbi David Eidensohn