
www.fightfolly.com America drowning in debt and deficits. There is no money for the elderly, no children to support Social Security and Medicare. What future is there?
(The following is a press-release from The National Non-Sectarian Council of Family Activists, the Gender Central Website at http://www.gendercentral.com)
Rabbi David Eidensohn, director of the National Non-Sectarian
Council of Pro-Family Activists, attacked the New York State Assembly for its
Bill A1118, “Dignity for All Students Act,” because it would demonize
biblical people and teach hate of the bible. It would also force all religious
schools to teach that homosexuality and cross-dressing, proscribed by the
bible, is acceptable. The state would issue teaching materials, textbooks and
other material about atypical sexual behavior and gender identification and
force every child in
“The Bill is called ‘Dignity for All Students’ but does not teach dignity for religious students,” said Rabbi Eidensohn. “By teaching that anyone who proscribes cross-dressing and homosexuality is a hater, inciter and bigot, we replace discrimination against gays with discrimination against biblical and traditional family people. Why can we not have dignity for all people, even religious ones?” asked Rabbi Eidensohn.
Rabbi Eidensohn slammed the
Rabbi Eidensohn noted a similar trick was done with the Dignity for All
Students Act, 1118, although in a less blatant manner. In Bill 1118, the
Dignity Law, there are five sections. The main sections are two and three. Two
contains a lengthy text to be added to the present law and ends with an
exemption for religious schools. This exemption applies only to section two.
Section three, however, does not exempt religious schools. One who is not an
expert on reading bills, and most people are not, would see the exemption at
the end of section two, and assume that the entire law contains an exemption
for religious schools, which is not true. Section three, including the
requirement for all schools in
“We have very little time to wake up,” said Rabbi Eidensohn. “The Supreme Court in Romers, 1996, already has described opposition to homosexuality, evidently biblically oriented, as “animus.” When we will realize that Gay Rights are Religious Wrongs, and that Civil Rights Laws for Gays will doom religious institutions?”
Every Gay Rights Bill, said Rabbi Eidensohn, provides more ammunition for legal terrorism, when the Gay Lobby, with its infinite resources in lawyers, sues small places of worship, schools and even private people for not conforming to the dictates of the Gay Lobby. “We must insist,” said Rabbi Eidensohn, “that every Gay Rights Bill contains clear and explicit exemptions for religious institutions. We must insist that Gay Rights Bills not teach hatred of biblical people. We must insist that Gay Rights Bills not teach that homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle. And after all that, we must realize that if we don’t defeat Gay Rights Bills, eventually, they will demonize and criminalize biblical and traditional family people.”
Rabbi Eidensohn noted that the Supreme Court has ruled limits on
freedom of religion, assembly and speech, in accord with “compelling
interests” of government. This means that when the state construes Gay
Rights as a very important issue, it may refuse to respect religious rights,
the right of assembly and speech that oppose Gay Rights. Just as one may not
cry “fire” in a crowded theater, and thus the “compelling interests”
of the state override one’s right to free speech, so one may not burn a
cross with intent to indicate hate of a protected minority. By making
homosexuals and cross-dresses equal in status to blacks, women and disabled
people, the state has proclaimed a “compelling interest” in the advance of
homosexuals and others with atypical sexual orientations. Biblical people
whose bible, speech and actions oppose homosexuality and other atypical sexual
orientations and practices are thus in the position of opposing, because of
religion, a “compelling interest of the state,” an untenable position. The
Supreme Court in
“The biblical and traditional family community is hiding its head in sand,” said Rabbi Eidensohn. “Surely, people think, this can’t be for real. Nobody is going to demonize or criminalize traditional family and the bible. But this is exactly what Gay Rights Bills are doing, and nobody notices, or nobody cares.
“The Gay Lobby thrives,” said Rabbi Eidensohn, “on the ignorance
of the masses of Americans, who, like the hapless masses of
Rabbi Eidensohn noted that nobody believed that gays could seize
control of governmental public health and take AIDS and HIV off the list of
state infectious diseases, but they did. Nobody believed that gays would seize
control of the federal medical dollar to divert critical funds for research on
cancer and heart disease to find a medicine for AIDS, but that is what
happened. Nobody believed that gays would seize control of public schools and
teach tiny tots about the glories of homosexuality, but they did. Nobody
believed that gays could terrorize therapists into reversing a century of
research and declare that homosexuality is not a disease, but they did. “Now
the gays are confronting the churches and parents, and want to demonize and
criminalize them,” said Rabbi Eidensohn. “Bill 1118 and other Gay Rights
Laws strike at the very civil rights of religious people to assemble in church
to worship, to speak biblical ideas against homosexuality and cross-dressing,
and to thrive in
Ten Years after the Get Bill - Insights into the Laws of Gittin
Ten years ago, New York State passed what is known as the GET law. The bill allows a judge, when determining how much a husband should pay his wife for support, to consider the pain and suffering of an Orthodox woman who cannot remarry because her husband refuses to give her a GET, an Orthodox divorce. This law violates a cardinal essence of divorce laws, that a husband not be forced to divorce his wife. A woman, therefore, who tells her lawyer to threaten a husband with court, may have an invalid GET. An Orthodox woman who wants a divorce must get one from a competent Beis Din, without pressures from a secular court. Any compelling of a divorce, be it physical abuse, or excessive monetary or emotional abuse, may be grounds to invalidate a GET.
I was privileged to hear from Reb Yosef Shalom Elyashev shlit"o, the world's leading authority, that any Rov who utilizes the GET law to force a husband to give a GET loses his authority to prepare Gittin, or Orthodox divorces. Rabbi Dovid Bleich, a major American authority, has come out very strongly against the GET law. We surely don't like AGUNOTH, but the feminist wars against men only make men angrier and in the end all women suffer from such wars. Anger does not improve things, even done in the service of saving Agunoth. Throughout America, men are refusing to marry, period, and the chill will penetrate our community, as it already has, making people who come to the Chupa prepared for the worst, and such anticipation does it terrible work.
|

We would like to hear from you: Drop us an e-mail line!
Please
do Contact
us
©copyright 2003-2005 Rabbi David Eidensohn