9/02/01

GAYS MAKE DISEASE AND DEMAND MONEY

The Associated Press on September 2, '01 reported that drug-resistant HIV is on the rise, and that by 2,005 42% of HIV cases will be resistant to any medications. The team of California researchers who made this discovery made four suggestions how to deal with this, such as starting drugs later, establishing new centers of highly experienced medical experts, develop new therapies and minimize ineffective medication. Rabbi David Eidensohn, director of the National Non-Sectarian Council of Pro-Family Activists, points out that the most important suggestion, that HIV and AIDS be declared an infectious disease like any other disease, is ignored. He said:

"First the gays tell us to take HIV and AIDS off of the infectious diseases lists so that government cannot trace infected people and stop the disease. The gays promise to police themselves, if only they are given money to educate their community. The government complies with both requests, only to find the gays are not getting educated, they are getting sick and spreading the disease. The gays then come and demand money for medicine to cure HIV and AIDS, because they won't practice safe sex. The government again surrenders, and takes billions of dollars away from research for cancer, heart disease, diabetes and mental illness to find a cure for AIDS. Finally, a medication is found to save the lives of infected people, but only if people follow the directions. The gays, however, are too busy with 'being what we are' to follow directions, so they take the very powerful medications, continue with unsafe sex, and produce strains of HIV and AIDS that are resistant to drugs. Then the gays come forward and say, 'Hey, we want money for a vaccine.' Nobody complains that the billions of dollars for the vaccine could go to make a vaccine for cancer or sicknesses of the majority. No, only what a gay wants is important. So now, in a few years, 42% of those taking incredibly expensive medication will be so sick that they will need medication that costs much more. And the band plays on," said Rabbi Eidensohn.

Rabbi Eidensohn noted that AIDS and HIV are not listed as infectious diseases in states with HIV Confidentiality Laws, such as the one passed in New York State in the eighties. Despite "reforms" and improvements in these ridiculous laws, they are still there to some degree, and causing billions of dollars of sickness. "The taxpayer cannot roll over and play dead every time the fanatics in the Gay Lobby demand more money for their problems. Let them practice safe sex, and let us have our money for our problems. We don't have to die so they can infect their partners and create new diseases," said the rabbi.

Rabbi Eidensohn noted that we cannot rely on super-medicines, because their great power is dangerous, such as the recent discovery that medicine for latent TB was causing mortal medical conditions. We must enforce public health, and stop those who spread diseases. "Gays do not have the right to infect themselves and others and make us pay for it," he said.

# # #

Racism Summit: Paradise for Haters and Dictators

8/31/01

The United Nations is holding a Racism Summit in Durban, South Africa. So hostile is the program to American and Israeli interests that both countries refused to send a high level representative. Jesse Jackson is to speak before a large crowd protesting the policies of America and Israel. United Nation Secretary-General Kofi Annan is shown in a media picture warmly greeting Cuban dictator Fidel Castro. (Reuters 8/31/01)

"The policy of the United Nations is to cater to the haters of the world, to honor Sudan, a slaver state, to greet Castro, a dictator and killer, and to condemn America, the bulwark of freedom," said Rabbi David Eidensohn, director of the National Non-Sectarian Council of Pro-Family Activists. "First they declared that Sudan and not America should be on the Human Rights Commission, because America is "bad" and Sudan is "good." Now they have a Racism Conference, and support Arab countries who sponsor terrorism, who won't allow a Jew to enter their country, who kidnap African blacks and sell them, who rape and whip child slaves, and who are intent on conquering others.

"The UN is a living, walking hate crime," said Rabbi Eidensohn. "It bites the hand that feeds it, America, and then turns snarling at its benefactor and says, 'Give me more, because you are guilty of racism.' If we don't stand up to these haters, they will destroy us," said the rabbi. "The UN is now ready to use its clout to batter America, first verbally, and then financially, with boycotts and penalties for American businesses. The fight against the UN is the first for American survival."

Rabbi Eidensohn noted that America saved Europe from Hitler, and helped build up Russia when it collapsed. Now these countries turn against America, trying to throw down its influence, and to control the world, a world where Americans will not be safe. "The secular world wants to throw down the bible, and raise the standard of radical sexuality and family culture. The only way to do that is to destroy America," said Rabbi Eidensohn. "G-d will protect us from the haters and the enemies of family and decent people."

# # #

August 19, '01

The More Money and Medicine the Gays Get, the More they Practice Unsafe Sex

The New York Times of August 19, 2,001 tells how gays, after decades of education and efforts to make people aware of safe-sex, increasingly have unsafe sex and thus spread HIV/AIDS. "Surveys of gay men in San Francisco and in other cities indicate that an increasing number, young and old, H.I.V. negative and H.I.V. positive, are engaging in high-risk sexual behavior. Unprotected anal intercourse, which carries a high risk of transmitting the AIDS virus, is becoming more common in bars and in sex clubs, at so-called circuit parties, where illicit drugs are used frequently, and in private sexual encounters, many of them arranged over the Internet."

Rabbi David Eidensohn, director of the National Non-Sectarian Council of Pro-Family Activists, noted that since the seventies when HIV/AIDS was known, the gays used the disease to get huge sums of money from the government and private contributions. This money was given to enable gays to control the disease through education and voluntary testing. The gays claimed that they were intelligent and responsible people, and didn't need public health officials to report cases of HIV and AIDS.

"What has happened when we gave them the money?" asked Rabbi Eidensohn. "What happened when we spent our health dollar to find medications for AIDS and neglected cancer, diabetes and heart disease? The gays repaid our generosity, they honored their commitments, by flaunting everything they promised. Instead of controlling the disease with voluntary testing, they are spreading it with completely irresponsible sex. They have sex with strangers, with many partners, and without condoms. Human life means nothing to them, just their selfishness. And they have the gall to blame 'bigotry' for the disease, because they want still more money."

In the seventies doctors found out about HIV and AIDS. The gays refused to be quarantined, so the politicians gave them HIV Confidentiality Bills, which declared that HIV and AIDs are not on the infectious disease list and so public health officials cannot control it. Even today, New York State does not list HIV or AIDS on the list of infectious diseases. "What did we get for this generosity?" asked Rabbi Eidensohn. "We got more disease. We got gays infecting dozens of partners, of strangers meeting strangers while they are on drugs and trading disease with impunity. We have given the gays everything, and in return, they have infected the inner cities, ravaged the blacks and women, and drained the health dollar, even destroying the health insurance market."

Rabbi Eidensohn urged Americans to stand up to the Gay Lobby while there is still time. "We spend billions to make medications for AIDS, and they take the medication the wrong way, and produce antigens that require a totally new level of spending. It will never end until we learn to say 'no' to the Gay Lobby. If they want to live like everyone else, fine, but if they want to kill themselves and make us pay for it, nothing doing," said the rabbi.

# # #

August 17, '01

Where are you, Senator Joseph Lieberman?

According to a recent government report, the government illegally discriminated against religious organizations and did not fund their social efforts. "Where is Senator Joseph Lieberman?" asked Rabbi Eidensohn, director of the National Non-Sectarian Council of Pro-Family Activists. "He is the point man to protect homosexuals from discrimination, and he claims to be religious. Why does he not speak out when religious groups suffer from government discrimination?"

Rabbi Eidensohn decried the lack of any outcry from the "anti-bigotry" elements on Capitol Hill. "This sends a clear message," said the rabbi. "If you discriminate against gays, that is wrong. If you discriminate against religious people, that is okay."

Rabbi Eidensohn decried the obvious double standard. "The silence of Senator Lieberman is an intolerable affront to those who fear for their rights, the biblical and religious community," said Rabbi Eidensohn. "We are not untermenshen (lower humans) and those who refuse to recognize bigotry against us show that we are."

Rabbi Eidensohn said that the constant hissing and name-calling by the Gay Lobby has produced an atmosphere whereby religious people are marginalized.

# # #

Government Bigotry Against Religion

On August 16, 2,001, the Associated Press reported on President's Bush's study on government funding for religious organizations that do secular social work. The ``Unlevel Playing Field'' report says that federal agencies refuse to fund religious organizations properly. ``It is not Congress, but these overly restrictive agency rules that are repressive, restrictive and which actively undermine the established civil rights of these groups,'' the report concludes. ``Such excessive restrictions unnecessarily and improperly limit the participation of faith-based organizations that have profound contributions to make in civil society's efforts to serve the needy.''

"I congratulate President Bush for reaching into the closet to find religious people," said Rabbi David Eidensohn, director of the National Non-Sectarian Council of Pro-Family Activists. "We, the religious community, always knew that we suffered discrimination, but now, for the first time, the President of the United States has revealed this in a study of government by the government."

Rabbi Eidensohn said, however, that this revelation of discrimination against religious groups is "just the tip of the iceberg." "Throughout America, in colleges, media, business and government, religious people are the only minority that receives blatant and undisguised contempt and bigotry," said the rabbi. "We have seen gays in cabinet positions, but biblical people are kept in the closet. Well, we want to come out. We want to come to the table. We want to be treated like everyone else, even if we do believe in heaven and hell, and don't keep interns in the Oval Office for our recreation."

Rabbi Eidensohn called upon President Bush to name biblical people to senior government positions, and to remove the stigma from biblical people that their enemies foster and foment. "We can no longer afford to be ashamed of religious people in government," said the rabbi. "If the government keeps us down, we are down. We don't want to be the last kid on the block to be invited to the party."

###

8/12/01

Hurting Blacks, Women and Homosexuals as Government Policy

By Rabbi David Eidensohn

A recent article in the New York Times tells how desperate black women seek husbands just to help them survive, and how the welfare system that once promoted black one-parent families, is now geared towards two-family marriages. Black women now marry, not because they want to, but because social programs dictate their marital status. Social experts consider such marriages, of convenience, of desperation, as unlikely to produce health children.

Who would believe, after the Civil War, that blacks, freed at such a frightful cost in human blood, would end up this way? The Civil war was the first mass military slaughter in warfare as modern rifles and cannon destroyed onrushing armies. These rivers of blood had set the black free from slavery. Now, people assumed, things would improve. They did, for a while, and the blacks, with their strong culture and religion, their cheerful spirits and steadfast hopes, began to rise, slowly but steadily, until in a few decades the segregated black community featured black insurance companies and other businesses, as well as various occupations that were controlled by blacks.

There were terrible problems, such as segregation in schools and even public transportation. The question was, how to deal with that? After the Second World War, blacks returned home, many of them war heroes, and found the hate as strong as ever. Some soldiers were lynched. Truman declared the army integrated, and the Supreme Court followed a few years later with the Brown decision, integrating America's public schools. Lyndon Johnson pushed through a strong Civil Rights law in 1964. In 1971 the Supreme Court sanctioned quotas for businesses in Griggs v Duke Power Company, and blacks had entr�e everywhere. A special government agency, the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunities Commission) replete with blacks and liberals, threatened all large businesses in America with lawsuits if they did not produce their quota of blacks.

From slavery until when these civil rights initiatives took effect, the black community was free of the ferocious criminals and killers that roam the inner-cities today. Until the Civil Rights movement, blacks were deeply religious, full of positive love and courage, and the inner cities were safe places. When the immigrant boat arrived at Ellis Island, New Yorkers woke up at all hours of the night to summon the resources to greet and feed the family arrivals. Young girls went running through the city in the wee hours, rapping on doors, getting material, running up the flights of steps of poverty-area tenements, and there was nothing to fear. Blacks, in those days, were fine, family people, and could always be counted on to help, never to hurt. All of that changed after the Civil Rights movement went into high gear.

As time goes on, the black community, always known for its sweet sounds and soul music, has become suffused with hate. Its leadership is highly anti-Semitic, and this is the mood in the street. Hatred of "whitey" is enormous, and the worst crime is black on black, when people simply kill and beat others for no reason, so filled are they with negative impulses.

It is time to point the finger of blame at the Civil Rights Movement itself. Whoever is helped by it becomes a victim. First, it destroyed blacks. It turned them into a culture of drugs and crime, helpless women with huge families and no husbands. It then turned its efforts on women, who are now burdened with the "freedom" to have a full time job, be a wife, be a parent, and somehow, be a man-woman or a woman-man as the mood of society and the culture ebbs and flows. When will we recognize what we are doing? When will we say stop? When will we stop tampering with nature? When will we realize that helping people doesn't mean hurting them?

America then tried to help gays. It passed, in the eighties, the HIV Confidentiality Laws that protected sick gays from the public health officials. Now gays could gather in public bathhouses and infect hundreds and thousands of people. The gays died hideously, and spread the disease to the inner cities, to the blacks, who are now reeling from the effects of this terrible epidemic. It then spread into heterosexual woman, who don't realize that the government protects them from sexually transmitted diseases only if the diseases are that of the majority, but not if it is a disease of gays.

Civil rights are civil wrongs, when they produce death and disease, destroy families, and force women to do anything to keep up with the latest policy regarding welfare.

# # #

Aug 10, '01

The Bush Education Initiative – The Real Solution

By Rabbi David Eidensohn

There is today a great debate going on in Congress, the White House, and the educational world about President Bush's Education initiative. President Bush wants to put teeth into a bill that demands progress and performance in American schools. Tests would determine who progressed and who failed, and would determine money grants to states and localities. The question is: what kind of tests?

"It is a shame that the focus is on such issues," said Rabbi David Eidensohn, director of the National Non-Sectarian Council of Pro-Family Activists. "We all know what the problems are. We know why students can't succeed in school to their true potential. And yet, President Bush isn't about to talk about those things, because he is afraid to. He wants to promote a program that ignores the impact of our culture and family problems upon students. There is no money in the world that can improve our schools until we untie the knot in the pupil's brain, a knot of stress and silliness that militates against learning."

Rabbi Eidensohn quoted a Rand report in the eighties that clearly stated that parochial schools, with little money, sent inner-city children to college, while the public schools, floating in billions, failed to do so. "If we don't make a natural environment for children, one for the pure, clean and decent child, who really wants to learn, and whose nature is geared to curiosity and achievement, we will fail. Money will not make the difference," said the rabbi.

"It is time for us to take off the blinders. Look at what home-schoolers are achieving, with almost no resources. Look at what the parochial schools are doing, with tiny resources. And look what the public schools are doing; they destroy children and produce mass murderers instead of teaching mathematics," said Rabbi Eidensohn.

"We will not succeed in education until we break the back of the NEA and the lobbies of atheism," said Rabbi Eidensohn. "Our children must not be fodder for the futile fantasies of the radical left. Now that the therapists are proclaiming the glories of intergenerational sex, and those who believe that 'autoeroticism is spirituality' dominate public school sex education, money will not make our students learn."

Rabbi Eidensohn called for President Bush to create a two-track public school system. In one track, students will be free of radical influences, and encouraged to stay away from sex, sick culture and secular radicalism. Parents will dominate the policies of this group. The other group, for those who want it, will be the regular public school agenda, with its accoutrements. This way, moral students can achieve, and we will not be spending money only to feed the NEA and other instruments of child-destruction.

"It is time," said Rabbi Eidensohn, "to let nature take its course. We must improve education by creating in all public schools, two tracks. In one track, there will be no sex to distract the students. Boys and girls will be separated. Abstinence from any serious sex, or any of it at young ages, will be taught. All radical and unnatural ideas will be banned. Children will not be taught to hate their parents, the "bigots," the "homophobes," or anyone. Children will be taught to love and respect. In the other track, public school as defined by the NEA will be available, for those parents who practice modern child-sacrifice. In this track, children will be taught that they are free of any influence from parents. They will be taught to hate their parents, religion, G-d, and traditional family values. They will be filled with anger, the great radical tool for revolution. And when things boil over, the graduates of this group will come to school, massacre their fellow-students, and the NEA will ask for more money to stop the Gun Lobby."

# # #

Aug 9, '01

A Scientific Challenge for Ethicists on Life Matters

By Rabbi David Eidensohn

President Bush has revealed his position on stem cell research. Is it ethical to produce human cells and use them as tools or studies? President Bush said, "Let's try it on a limited and controlled basis, and see what happens." At the time time, on Thursday, Aug 9, 01, two state courts ruled on matters of life and death. A California court ruled that it is forbidden to remove the feeding tube of a conscious person, even if they are unable to communicate or have any normal social or personal function. On the other hand, a Florida court ruled that it was permissible to remove the feeding tube of a woman in a coma many years, despite the claim from her parents that she can recover, and does somehow communicate with them. Presidents and judges now have to rule on matters of life and death, despite the paucity of precedent and proof to inform them.

Who is the expert on life? Is it the doctor? Doctor's begin their practice with fully developed humans, not cells. Biologists deal with cells, but have no expertise to inform us on ethics. We therefore must invent the "ethicist," a person who may have read a few books about ethical problems, has some intelligence and probably a scientific background, and pretend that this solves the problem. It doesn't.

On June 28, a British researcher visiting CalTech, Dr. Sam Parnia, released a study on near-death experiences. It proved, scientifically, that some people whose hearts stopped, who were dead on the operating table, whose brains without blood had no function, knew what the doctors were saying after they had died. Their souls had fled the body, but still knew what the doctors were doing. The conclusion was that "consciousness, or the soul, keeps thinking and reasoning even if a person's heart has stopped, he is not breathing and his brain activity is nil." (Reuters) This scientific proof of the soul should shock the scientific world. It should make everyone get up and re-think the atheistic bent of the scientific community. Here we see that there is more than the blood and the brain. If so, life has a new dimension, and the ethicists better learn about it.

# # #

Aug 8, '01

What Nobody Wants to Know about Homosexuals

By Rabbi David Eidensohn

All of us in the family-values community are up in arms against the Gay Lobby, but sometimes we forget that the enemy is not just the young guy with the earrings. The enemy is often right behind us: some kindly grandfather, a sweet teen, or a quiet parent. It is easy to arouse the troops when the druggies and perverts come charging over the hill demanding our children, but when child molesters are busy in our backyards, and we don't know enough to watch out, the damage can be much worse.

There are thousands of Americans fighting the gays while their children are away in sleepover summer camp. What they don't know is that their kids in camp are in great danger of learning the very things we don't want. Boys alone with boys in the summertime, when discipline is relaxed, and schedules are loose, is the biggest problem. Thousands of boys simple and pure will go to camp and come home much different. Summer is suspect because wherever children go swimming there are pedophiles panting behind. No, it's not pleasant to talk about. Years ago, I wrote a book about this. I got a call from a clergyman. He said, "A congregant came to me with your book, and he said, 'If I had read this book earlier, my child and all of her classmates would not have been molested by their teacher.'"

Nobody is safe. No age group, no parent, no teacher can be considered beyond the pale of suspicion. Never trust anyone. Arm your child with a warning, as I do, about the "piggy-men." One day my kid came rushing into the house. "Tatee, tatee," he called to me, " a piggy man came after me." We ran outside and the piggy man just made it to his car a few steps ahead of me. He never came back to my neighborhood.

One day a man called me: "I've got him," he exulted. "I found out about a molester and I'm going to call the police and fix him." I congratulated him, but also, told him the facts of life. The man was stunned. He could not believe it when I told him that a parent who calls the police can ruin his child and the lives of the parents, because the Family Courts with their secular feminist anti-religious social workers and therapists will take control of the child's mind and run the family. A few hours later, the phone ran. "I checked out what you said, and I thank you," the father said. If you have to go to the police, make sure you have a good lawyer and a good therapist; otherwise, they will do what they want. In some courts, a parent is at fault if a child is sick, and then, the parent is treated terribly, and forced to undergo therapy at great financial and emotional cost.

A prominent educator had a molested son. He called the police and they arrested the molester. The molester got a good lawyer, and a little boy is no match for a good lawyer. The man went free, and the boy and family live in pain and disgrace.

All of this is said not so we despair but to get us to improve the situation, and not let the family courts be controlled by those who despise parents and religion. There are plenty of molesters in the religious community, and we have to know how to deal with them. We have to be sensitive to the pain of the molester, and know that his soul is aflame with guilt, at least with a normal religious person. We must be sensitive to the family of the molester, and not ruin the reputations of the family members. We must be sensitive to the molested children, and to all of those who could be victims. We must be aware of the terror of ubiquitous threats to our children, because only in that is our salvation. We have to fight for our children, and keep our eyes open. When you think you have heard everything, then you and yours are in big trouble.

# # #

Aug 7, '01

Don't Blame Them for the Millions of Lost Children: Blame You

The Census Bureau release figures that almost six million elderly grandparents had to raise grandchildren, many on limited income. Conservative groups blamed this on the culture and said we need more religious values, respect for marriage, and clerical intervention. Rabbi David Eidensohn, director of the National Non-Sectarian Council of Pro-Family Activists, criticized conservative family experts for this. "More religion and more preaching about family values are not going to turn the tide," he said. "We've got to wake up and stop blaming 'them,' and start blaming ourselves. We raise children to watch television. We raise children to go to public school. We raise children and send them to college. We let them go here and there and everywhere, and then, duh, there are problems." Rabbi Eidensohn noted that the Bible Belt has a huge divorce rate, and that when people are exposed in college and high school to sex, they are going to have sex, and this means out-of-wedlock births, serious emotional problems, and risky marriages.

"We have to make up our minds. The facts are clear. If you don't get your children out of the world, away from the public schools, colleges, movies, videos, magazines and entertainment, away from the bums, then expect the grandchildren to arrive when you have almost no strength or money left."

# # #

Condoms are Not the Issue

by Rabbi David Eidensohn

An article by John Rossomando in CNSNews.com highlights the grievous problem facing public health doctors about safe sex and condoms. A recent National Institute of Health study of condoms showed that they are not safe for many Sexually Transmitted Diseases, and even with HIV, when they are most effective, they are far from perfect. If so, what should public health policy be? Should everyone be told the truth, that condoms do not make sex safe? On the other hand, that would just make things worse because a condom is at least better than nothing. This is the debate. Some say tell the truth, even if people get discouraged and don't use any condoms, and some say, don't tell the truth, promote condom use, because people will have sex, and better something than nothing. The debate has raged to the point where ten thousand doctors ask for the resignation of the head of the Center for Disease Control because he refuses to make war against condoms, and let everyone know that they are not safe.

Frankly, I am disappointed with this debate. I don't think that condoms is the issue, although, of course, doctors may be busy with it. Parents and those concerned about sexually transmitted diseases cannot allow an important issue such as sexual health to be limited to these two sides of the coin. Neither is going to get us very far. Everyone knows that for millions of Americans, condoms are their best chance, because they have sex with sick people, and condoms provide at least minimal protection. Everyone also knows that by so doing, we run the risk of telling people who would not have sex to have sex, and to rely on condoms. Therefore, either side of this debate, even if it were technically and medically correct, is flawed, and people are at risk.

The real problem is not about condoms. The problem is about biology. If we tell children that condoms are not safe, what have we achieved? We have told our children the following: Go to public school, or even parochial school, and meet people of the opposite sex. While you are old enough to be biologically boiling, go on dates, go dancing, swimming and to the beach, talk and flirt, but remember that condoms are no solution. Watch television, videos and movies about sex, have entertainment that is pornography, and at the end of the day, while your hormones are exploding, remember that condoms are not safe.

The debate over condoms ignores the real issue. Are children, indeed, anyone sexually viable, and especially those in their teens when their systems are red hot and unstable, able to live in our society, get constant stimulus from people of the other sex, television, movies, magazines, videos, and what else, and then find a path in life that is safe? No way.

There is no safe sex outside of marriage. There is no safe stimulus for sex. There is no way that people can be put into an environment designed for constant sexual stimulation without sex and its sicknesses. If we want an America safe from sexually transmitted diseases, we must provide the environment for it. We must raise our children without a television, videos, and magazines, just like I raise my children. We must ensure that unless people are ready for sex, which means marriage, they have nothing to do with the opposite sex.

Freud said that every uncompleted sexual act poisons a person emotionally. He felt that sex was a cleansing of our emotional toxins, but only if done without the measures that young people must indulge in to prevent pregnancy and other problems. If we want people to be emotionally and physically healthy, we must restate the debate about condoms. We must design our children's environment so that it does not have any stimulus for sex that does not lead to marriage and normalcy.

# # #

Homosexuality and Science

By Rabbi David Eidensohn

What does science say about homosexuality? Are gays "normal" or are they sick? Are gays reduced to their condition or can they change? There is another issue about science and homosexuality that lurks behind every discussion of homosexual rights: what does science have to say about Leviticus 18:22, that homosexuality is an "abomination" before G-d?

Until the Gay Lobby, in the sixties, launched a furious assault on the minions of therapists, science maintained that gays were sick. All of a sudden, a new, politically correct science declared that homosexuality is just fine. Now, therapists have gone so far as to suggest that children molested by pedophiles may benefit emotionally!

If we were not politically scientific, we would define a mental illness as anything that forces a person to do what he prefers not to do. Any behavior that causes a person social, family, cultural or religious anguish, is a sickness. Homosexuality, because it forces a person to act in a way that he prefers not to, is surely an illness. The politically correct or frightened therapists declared that homosexuality is not an illness, and even hinted at sanctions at anyone who treated a homosexual who wants to become heterosexual. At the same time, they debated declaring all forced behavior a disease, even if there are no ill effects, such as a condition whereby a person must stare at a wall. The fact that a person must do something he prefers not to do is an illness. And yet, homosexuality, because of its political status, is not an illness!

Let us take the case of Jack who comes to his therapist. Jack, married with children, suffers from his homosexuality. He knows that the homosexuals he meets practice unsafe sex and he may end up infected and even kill his wife. He therefore seeks help. The therapist, however, in his most politically correct indignation, responds that homosexuality is just as normal as heterosexuality, and Jack's pain is due only to social bigotry and homophobia. Jack leaves, and cries in his beer; his life is ruined. In comes Tony, who can't help staring for five minutes a day at the wall. Tony gets such sympathy. "My friend," says the doctor, "we are going to make you better. A human being must be free of any coerced behavior!" Tony, who stares at a wall for five minutes a day, gets help from science, and Tony, whose life is ruined by his terrible and uncontrollable homosexual illness, gets a lecture on something that has nothing to do with science and medicine.

We then come to the issue of science and whether homosexuality is treatable. Can a homosexual become a heterosexual? Dr. Spitzer, the noted Columbia Professor, presented proof to the American Psychiatric Assocation, on May 9 of this year, that homosexuals can become heterosexual. Indeed, there are many people running around in this country who have changed. There are organizations that work day and night to change homosexuals, such as Narth, Exodus, and Jonah. All of those who changed don't exist according to the politically correct therapists. Ex-gays who marry and have families are declared phantoms, frauds, the product of religious fanaticism, and a phenomenon that flies in the face of what science must truly believe. Such scientific thought denies even the finding of a respected colleague, the same Dr. Spitzer who led the fight to make homosexuality a politically correct issue rather than a disease. On May 9, 2,001, Dr. Spitzer announced to the world that homosexuals can change and become heterosexual, and on July 9, Dr. Satcher, the Surgeon General holdover from Clinton, announced that there is no scientific evidence that a homosexual can change. Modern science has the power to press a magic, politically correct wand, and make real people, ex-gays, disappear. It can even make a therapist from Columbia, speaking at the national convention of the American Psychiatric Association, disappear, with his evidence, with his ex-gays, and presto, (probably retroactively) the good name of politically correct science is restored.

We then come to the last issue: What does science say about Leviticus 18:22, that G-d considers homosexuality to be an "abomination"? I am an Orthodox Jew, and I believe that Leviticus is G-d's word to Moses, a divine Law. I am the son of America's leading battery scientist, Samuel Eidensohn, who doubled the American battery submarine fleet's power with one invention; my brothers have medical doctorates, and we all believe in the Torah Law as a scientific fact. How can we feel that way?

Einstein's theory of relativity posited a Big Bang, a creatio-ex-nihilo, comprising a singular physics that violates physics as we know it. This is Creation. We know that an imploding star collapses eventually into a small ball or speck. This small ball or speck has such a huge mass that is creates a black hole around it. In the environment of the black hole everything is sucked in, because the great mass violates the surrounding spatial gravitational fabric so that nothing there can escape its pull. Everything is pulled in, to disappear and never re-appear. How then did the universe, which began in the Big Bang as the tiniest of specks containing the mass of the entire universe, expand? How could anything leave that primal speck? How could the speck expand, even turn into the large universe? Obviously, only a Creator could so bend scientific laws to create a universe and release the universe from the grip of infinite mass. Science reveals the glory of G-d, whose will is revealed at Sinai and the Torah Law in Leviticus.

In August, 2,001, an international scientific study found mighty blazing quasars, an advanced level of star, at the very dawn of the Big Bang. A researcher asked, "How in the devil did such massive beacons, with their accompanying huge black holes, get created so quickly? It tells us that we don't really understand enough detail about how galaxies formed." Of course, if we accept creation, the Big Bang had no reason to wait around before allowing tufts of primal plasma to form stars. G-d wanted stars, and they came earlier than if they had just formed accidentally.

How did people form? The icon of evolution, Dr. Steven Gould of Harvard, tells it like it is: There is no biological process that produces higher life forms, because nature and biology produce only the same life, not higher forms. Therefore, "If the Tree of Life was planted again, life would not form as it is today." If so, how did we get here, Dr. Gould? "It was an accident that took place over a long period of time." What long period of time? How much time is needed for a primal plasma to produce life as we know it? A mathematical study showed that the odds against accidental evolution are not one to a million, not one to a billion, not one to a trillion, but one to such a high number that just writing the zeros to its power would be prohibitive. I told this to Dr. Paul Erdos, the Hungarian mathematical genius who explained the Theory of Numbers to Albert Einstein, and he said that he had heard of the study. Did Dr. Gould hear of it?

Let's talk science. Physics believes in entropy, a major law of nature whereby all organized systems tend to disorder and eventually break down. This is the precise opposite of evolution, which posits that organized systems tend to improve and become higher and more complex. Evolution thus defies mathematics and physics, which is a hard thing to do and remain scientific. No, evolution is anti-science; it is a fanaticism made every day more unscientific, especially by the revelation of life processes such as DNA.

So, G-d created the world. Why did He do it? Only He can tell us, as we cannot anticipate His ideas. Therefore, we must assume that if there is a Creator there must be a Torah, a Law. We must also assume that this Law was given in a rational, scientific way, because we cannot have truth without logic and science. This is exactly what the Torah teaches. G-d spoke at Sinai to an entire nation and publicly spoke the Ten Commandments, and commanded the Torah to Moses. That Torah considers homosexuality wrong.

A scientific thesis is proven when experiment, repeatedly, authenticates it. The Jewish people's history is utterly remarkable and unusual in the annals of history. That Jewry survives, despite being hated for millenniums by the major powers of the earth, and even thrives, is a proof, a scientific one, of G-d and the veracity of His Torah Law. Frederick the Great, the philosopher king of Prussia, once asked a Lutheran minister for proof of G-d. He relied, "The Jews."

We must discuss homosexuality from a rational and scientific point of view. We will find this in the Bible, and in rational, true science. Homosexuality can only thrive in a world where creation is a magic or mysticism, evolution is an "accident" that defies all scientific criteria, and mental illness is defined by the sickest of our society. Today the therapists, in the name of "science," declare that pedophilia is healthy for children, that a person in anguish because of homosexuality may not be treated, and that anyone who disagrees has a mental illness called "homophobia." This is not science. It is a post-modern and post-scientific science, an anti-truth dedicated to perverting truth, society, and children.

# # #

Aug 4, 01

What is Wrong with Gay Rights?

Rabbi David Eidensohn

Should homosexuals be given rights? Should people be allowed to refuse to employ a homosexual? Should people be allowed to refuse a homosexual an apartment to rent? What, indeed, is wrong with homosexuality?

Until we, the battlers against the Gay Lobby, learn to answer these questions effectively, we will lose. What is the proper response?

We begin with the bible and its declaration in Leviticus 18:22 that homosexuality is "an abomination." Of course, many sincere and good people have a great problem with that law. I have worked with some of them. This, however, does not change the reality of G-d's Will. Homosexuality is, in the eyes of G-d and religious people, an abomination.

Secular people reject homosexuality on other grounds. They say that it is not natural. They say that society cannot survive without the family, and that the family requires a heterosexual relationship. They feel that taking homosexuality out of the closet will lead to the sexual slippery slope whereby every year another abomination will be accepted, until the ultimate, intergenerational sex, already declared for by some therapists, arrives with all of its accoutrements. All this is true.

The problem with these approaches is that they falter upon the reality of a true homosexual drive. What do we say to someone who may believe in the bible, who feels that he is perverted, but must be homosexual? People are not homosexuals because they dismiss the bible or want to reject the normal kind of marriage. They are homosexual because they can't help themselves. While it is true that Dr. Spitzer has shown that some very dedicated people can break away and become heterosexual, a person who, like me, has problems with the pantry, and cannot diet effectively, is a hypocrite to insist that everyone conquer their passions and appetites. Therefore, the only truly effective way to stop the homosexual movement is to find out those things that produce homosexuals and stop them. The problem with this is that the things that produce homosexuality are gaining not declining, and tomorrow will be much worse. If so, we have even less of a response to the homosexual lobby, and whatever we can utter is increasingly silenced by those forces that produce ever more perversions. What are these forces that produce perversion?

People who are raised normally enjoy normal sex, and those who are raised abnormally, cannot enjoy normal sex. Normal sex comes from growing up in a normal two-parents family where children grow up happy. Those who marry the way G-d and nature intended will procreate with normal pleasure. Those whose boiling biology has no such outlet will use their twisted and perverted systems to find twisted and perverted sexuality. Our society is one where the average amygdala, the emotional seat of the brain, is so scarred from sexual and gender frustration that normal sex is increasingly out of the question.

What makes you normal? You are supposed to be raised by Mommy and Daddy so that you are full of self-esteem, ready for the world. You then go out into the world, and it buffets you, but Mom and Dad are there, sometimes after they are departed, but they never depart, because you are Mom and Dad, and you can take it, it's that simple. You go to your spouse, and you say, "I am here. Mom and Dad are here/ Grandma and Grandpa are here. I love me, and now, I am ready to love you. I only know a life lived to love and help others." Such a woman will have a chance at a real happy marriage, assuming of course, that she brings Mom and Dad to the wedding.

Let's look at a different person who grows up in the typical American house of today. Mom is working, poor soul, to support her kiddies since hubby split after years of abusing her and cheating on her. He waited until Mom started with the white hairs, ditched her and took up with a nice young chick. Mom hates Dad; Dad hates Mom. Both are so consumed with hate that kids get very little love if any. Such a child grows up and his biology won't let go. He finds a girl and first thinks of relieving himself. He also thinks of hurting her and himself, because that was the sexual and marital state of his environment. The girl, who may share his experience and scars, understands that to relieve her biology she must become a toilet. Either she lives with a vibrator or another woman or she takes what modern women must. Every time she does, she learns a new dimension in hate. Pity their children. If America is raising such ruined children, how can we demand that people have normal sex?

Therefore, as time goes on, as marriage goes downhill, the number of people, religious or "natural," who "must" be homosexual, bestial, sadistic or masochistic will certainly grow, and their influence will push hard at the very gates of the traditional family. We don't want that to happen, we want everyone who is homosexual, etc., to check into Narth and get cured, but it is unlikely that our next generation of sick people will all get cured. If so, what will happen to them, and, more to the point, what will happen to us, the remnants of normal marriage and family? We are going to be pressured with the sounds and fury of sickness, and we will struggle, not only to contain the barbarians at the gates, but also to restrain our own children from the incessant noises and habits of a growing population of perverts.

The future America will be two communities, one, parents desperate to raise normal children, hanging on for dear life in marriages battered by the culture, and the other half, the lost and the losers, the perverts, the homosexuals, the pedophiles, the bestiality bunch and those who delight in torture. These are the facts. What do we do about it?

There is only one solution. We, the normal people, must be free to live our lives without being forced by the government to watch perversion. We must fight for our lives and the lives of our children against ENDA, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and all forms of gay civil rights laws. We cannot thrive; we cannot survive as biblical and normal families if our children watch men drinking each other's urine. If the Gay Rights law passes, the gays will move into our homes and jobs, and they will do their thing there, confident in the power of the courts, where to attack homosexuality is very expensive. We cannot be biblical in our hearts when our eyes take in women exchanging French kisses. We cannot be normal if our offices are cluttered with people talking about their unnatural desires. Once a homosexual gets into our home or office, the next step is to talk and say whatever he wants, and that is free speech. If the free speech is about homosexuality, and homosexuality is protected, who can stop him?

We cannot watch our children twenty-four hours a day. All we can do is to provide for them schools without pedophiles and perverts for teachers. If ENDA passes, a member of ACT-UP can become the principal of an elementary school. Anything he says, especially off campus, is free speech. He can invite students to his house, like the teacher on White Plains did, and your imagination is your guide. Once homosexuals and perverts can go into any office, they will use their opportunities to "come out" and talk what they want, do what they want, and the law is on their side. In such an environment, with pedophiles and perverts working their routes among people devoted to their children, something will give. If there is violence, the gays will get much more power. When they do, ENDA and its next generation will press and stress even more, until the very survival of normalcy will be only when we flee into the wilderness, one where even a pervert would not go, but who knows?

Today, biblical and family people live in the eye of the hurricane. All around the outer forts are crumbling. How long can it last? It can continue only until the homosexuals are declared normal.

The world is sick. Our only hope is to know it. If we hang on, and the world hits bottom, it will have to come back to biblical and family living. That is happening already as Steinhem and Madonna marry, even as their disciples shriek in anguish at this heresy. Nobody can live for long without family and values. If, on the other hand, the law destroys biblical and family communities, there will be nobody to return to.

Therefore, we answer, what is wrong with Gay Rights? Gay Rights means that nobody will live without the sounds and sights of perversion, and family and biblical people will have enormous pain and suffering. They, the core of a normal and thriving society, will be battered, and in their struggles, society will be consumed.

# # #

Press Release for Immediate Release – Aug 3, 01

Gay Rights or Gay Wrongs?

By Rabbi David Eidensohn

Why am I against Gay Rights? Is it because I have an irrational fear of homosexuals? Do I, in the parlance of the Gay Lobby, have a phobia of people who are homosexual? Do I tremble and lose control when confronted with homosexuals? I don't think so, after working for decades with extremely sick people, and homosexuals were the better of the problems. Some of the people I worked with were so sick that some doctors refuse to get involved anymore with "my cases." I can't blame them, really.

Others may feel that I oppose the Gay Lobby because I am an uneducated ignoramus, and was not exposed to higher ideas. This is not likely an explanation. I grew up in the home of a scientific genius, and my theories of computers, Internet, technology, social problems, sexology, etc., have been praised and even called genius by America's leading government and private industry technology captains. I have spent my life studying, writing and thinking, and my works have unrivalled approbations. Because I, like my brothers and friends, go for a very wide area of learning, Talmud, Cabala, physics, psychology, etc., it is unlikely that my ignorance has made me oppose the Gay Lobby. Precisely the opposite is true. I oppose the Gay Lobby because it is obvious that the forces that propel the Gay Lobby are the same ones that raised up Stalin and Hitler. Indeed, I tremble when I see the college professors, secular intellectuals, atheist media, children with more energy than knowledge go gaga over Gay Rights or almost anything. None of these opposed Stalin, even while he openly starved twenty million farmers, and publicly slaughtered and jailed innocent people. What these people want is always suspicious. None of them opposed Stalin, and if they opposed Hitler, it was often because Hitler opposed Stalin. Jean Paul Sartre was a radical Communist, and Martin Heidegger was an early enthusiastic backer of Adolph Hitler. Despite Heidegger's love of Hitler, Sartre was greatly influenced by his writings. What these people want is to re-invent the world, and they will do it by putting me into prison, a mental asylum, or somewhere else.

Am I against the Gay Lobby because, as they would say, I am a hater, a Nazi, an admirer of Hitler? This is unlikely, because my wife was born in the Lida, Poland ghetto, and Nazis murdered her family. Indeed, if I oppose the Gay Lobby, it is precisely because I am deathly afraid of Hitler, and I believe that the Gay Lobby is one of those groups that will play propaganda songs until society falls asleep, and then seize power and destroy people like me. The Gay Lobby, as I see it, is not looking for Gay Rights, they are looking to seize power, like other secular radical groups. Napoleon was one of the most extreme fighters against the French monarchy until he came to power and declared himself Emperor.

The Gay Lobby is not just about homosexuality; it is about those who want to tear apart the traditional, biblical, family world. The billion-dollar entertainment industry sees biblical people as a threat to their profits. It makes money from teaching children unrestricted sex, and making music about killing. The college professors who preach in front of young people believe that only they can open the door to knowledge and wisdom. They have an invested interest in teaching children that tradition is bad, that parents are morons, and that only those who believe that "autoeroticism is spirituality" can teach truth as it really is. This attitude permeates the NEA and the teachers' unions at all levels. I want my children to grow up wholesome, and to follow my inspiration. The Gay Lobby would tear my children away from me, and indeed, government is now moving inexorably toward substitute parents. A textbook for elementary school has a story about an old fool and a young smart person. The teacher's manual explained that this teaches children that their parents are not wise, only young people with new ideas are.

I oppose the Gay Lobby because both of us will not be able to thrive in the same society, and I do not intend to get off of the world before my time, nor do I intend to let my children come into a world to suffer, and ask, "Daddy, why didn't you try to stop them?"

# # #

   Rabbi David Eidensohn of the National Non-Sectarian Council of Pro-Family Activists slammed Senator Joseph Lieberman for attempting to force faith organizations to hire homosexuals in order to qualify for funding in Bush's Faith-based charity. "Senator Lieberman wants his kind of religion to prevail," said Rabbi Eidensohn. "He wants religion to serve the gay lobby, a group that seeks to destroy biblical values and the biblical community's institutions. Senator Lieberman wants to shove gays down the throat of all Americans, to use Federal funds to force gays into churches, synagogues, parochial schools and traditional family communities."
    Rabbi Eidensohn asked, "Where are we going when civil rights means the end of traditional American living? Where are we going when gays can get Federal fundings even though they hate and incite against biblical people, but biblical people cannot qualify for Federal fundings because Senator Lieberman wants to teach biblical people 'tolerance.'"
    "It is time," said Rabbi Eidensohn, "for Senator Lieberman to be tolerant of the word of G-d. It is time for him to take his hands off of the throat of the grassroots of this country, those who know that G-d not only created the world at the Big Bang but also gave the Ten Commandments and the law in Leviticus prohibiting homosexuality."
    Rabbi Eidensohn condemned Senator Lieberman's wearing his Orthodoxy on his sleeve, when such an Orthodoxy denies that Moses received Leviticus from G-d. "Let Senator Lieberman invent his own Orthodoxy, but allow those who have the Orthodoxy of Moses and Maimonides, and the vast majority of Orthodox Jews, who think that Lieberman is a denier, to have their religion and practice it without the government of Big Brother," said Rabbi Eidensohn.
    Rabbi Eidensohn condemned the media practice of refering to Lieberman as "Orthodox Jewish." "No Orthodox Jew who believes in the Torah would take the side of those considered in Leviticus to be "abominations," the rabbi said. "Lieberman has torn up the Torah and invented a new one, he has torn up Orthodoxy and offered a new one, and now he wants to tear up America and make it into a new one, a gay society where biblical people tremble in the closet," said Rabbi Eidensohn. "This man is a danger and terror to all traditional people, and he does it in the name of G-d's religion. He is worse than Barney Frank," the rabbi said. "Barney may love male prostitutes, but he doesn't claim to be Orthodox," said the rabbi.

Mr. Hannity called this morning to assure me, although it was not really necessary, that his remarks about Jewish "Arranged" marriages were respectful and as evinced in the article, complimentary.Of course!

Press Release for Immediate Release - Thur July 12, 01
Regarding: Menace from the UN and European Union to Israel and Biblical People
The National Non-Sectarian Council of Pro-Family Activists

High School Girls are Toys for Boys

Government Bigotry Against Religion

Hurting Blacks, Women and Homosexuals as Government Policy

By Rabbi David Eidensohn

What Nobody Wants to Know about Homosexuals

Don't Blame Them for the Millions of Lost Children: Blame You

Protecting Rapists and Endangering Children in New York City